MARK D. STONER
MARK D. STONER
I recommend Mark D. Stoner for judicial office.
Response
Response Total
Yes
95.21%
278
No
4.79%
14
Total Respondents*
292
*Survey respondents were asked to comment only upon those candidates with whom they have had direct professional contact within the last four years. All questions were optional.
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION:
Education: Indiana University-Indianapolis School of Law, January 1981. Graduated cum laude. Graduate, Indiana Graduate School for Judges, June 2004
Judicial Experience: Elected 11/2000 as Marion Superior Court Judge. Supervising Judge, all Adult Probation Services 2002-present. Member, Indiana Judicial Board of Directors 2004-present. Indiana State Probation Committee 2002-present, presently Committee Chair.
Significant Legal Accomplishments: Marion County Deputy Prosecutor 1981-2000; Director of Training, 1991-2000, Senior Deputy 1985-2000, Major Felony Deputy for 20 years with well over 100 jury trials tried. Faculty, National Institute of Trial Advocacy 1988-present. Author: "The Employment Contract: What You Should Know;" 1988 national publication, American Guild of Organists.
Other Legal Involvement: Member, Indianapolis Bar Association. Member, Marion County Bar Association. Fellow, Indianapolis Bar Foundation. Chairman, IBA Bench Bar Conference 2003. Member, Indianapolis Bar Association , IBA/MCBA Justice Center Task Force Locations/Facilities Subcommittee 2004-present. Marion County Strategic Planning Implementation Team.
Personal Statement: I have presided over three courts since 2000. I have maintained or reduced each caseload, despite hearing 60-100 cases daily. I have promoted efficiency and collegiality amongst the bar. I have actively sought additional resources for the entire judicial system and will continue to do so.
|
How would you rate Mark D. Stoner on the following: Note: Totals in parentheses denote number of respondents | ||||||
|
1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5 (Strongly Agree) |
No | |
| This person is hard-working. |
1% |
1% |
3% |
20% |
72% (213) |
2% |
| This person is efficient. |
1% |
1% |
6% |
21% |
66% (194) |
4% |
| This person is ethical. | 1% (4) |
2% |
3% |
19% |
73% (215) |
1% |
| This person is impartial. | 2% (6) |
6% (18) |
6% (19) |
21% (63) |
62% (183) |
2% |
| This person correctly applies the law. | 2% (5) |
3% |
9% |
21% |
63% (185) |
3% |
| This person demonstrates the proper temperament and demeanor expected of a judge. | 1% (4) |
3% |
8% |
19% |
69% (201) |
0% |